When this happens, the immune system has to rely on more specialized effectors of our immune system (i.e., antigen-specific Abs and T cells) to fight the pathogen. Geert Vanden Bossche - PhD, DVM - Independent | LinkedIn Former Virologist warns HALT ALL Covid-19 Mass Vaccinations In an open letter to the World Health Organization, Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD warns "all authorities, scientists and experts around the world [and the] entire world population" to put a stop to the mass vaccinations for Covid-19. This material may not be reproduced without permission. American Conservative University: Meeting of the COVID-19 Giants with This makes no sense, Yale's Omer told us. They do not. He does apparently have some history working on vaccines. Thus if evidence emerges that particular variants do appear to influence vaccine efficacy, it should be possible to periodically reformulate the vaccines so that they better match the circulating strains. This problem will be exacerbated, he claims, because people who have been vaccinated (and/or social distancing and staying inside during the pandemic) will be less capable of fighting off those strains than someone who has not been vaccinated. If the body ends up making low levels of these antibodies, i.e. He is at present primarily serving as a Biotech / Vaccine consultant while also conducting his own research on Natural Killer cell-based vaccines. People who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 seem . The bottom-line is that I dont see how mass vaccination campaigns would not lead to a disastrous aggravation of the Covid-19 . At this point, I will also mention that, because Ed Nirenberg produced an excellent rebuttal of Dr. Vanden Bossches mangling of immunology in his letter, Ill stick more to my lane (mostly, anyway), although there will be some overlap. Despite taking Vanden Bossches assertions extremely seriously, these high-profile alternative-media figures dont even do basic due diligence such as looking into McMillan, whos the man who interviewed Vanden Bossche, or the company McMillan is apparently affiliated with, Vejon Health. The author's unique approach and reliance on basic scientific principles make this a valuable addition to the literature on the subject. Such claims are generally an offshoot of another favorite antivaccine claim, namely that the diseases being vaccinated against are so innocuous that vaccinating against them is overkill and allowing infection and natural herd immunity to occur is better, a trope that has also been resurrected about COVID-19, a disease thats killed well north of 500K people in just the US in a little over a year. In my new book, The inescapable immune escape pandemic, I am sharing my insights and perspectives on how the Covid-19 pandemic continues to evolve. . Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations. Renowned Belgian virologist and vaccination expert Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche served as head of the German Center for Infection Research in Cologne as Head of the Vaccine Development Office. Whats particularly dangerous about Dr. Vanden Bossches misinformation is that, on the surface, he appears to be a vaccine expert, whom antivaxxers touting his open letter (and all the follow-up science hes been Tweeting and posting to his website) have been describing as a worlds expert in vaccines. (Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Plan) Director, Research Program Leader and Head of Adjuvants . Vanden Bossche is expressing an opinion not supported by biology . So the question becomes: do the COVID-19 vaccines give us low or high levels of neutralizing antibodies? Please use a different way to share. The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic by Geert Vanden Bossche DVM PhD For vaccines, resistance equates to strains of the microbe, the virus, or the bacteria that can elude the imperfect immunity created by the vaccine. What Ill do instead is to point out that Dr. Vanden Bossche, whether he realizes it or not, is supporting the conventional argument with respect to COVID-19 vaccination. As I suspected, Dr. Vanden Bossche is selling something. (He bases this on the observation that in those infected with COVID-19 asymptomatically, S-specific Ab levels decline faster than in those with symptomatic infections.) Truly, in the age of COVID-19, everything old is new again, and the antivaccine grift continues. Saltar al contenido principal.es. Vanden Bossche has created a scientific-sounding argument that vaccination will encourage the production of COVID-19 variants that our immune systems will be unprepared to fight. Geert Vanden Bossche PhD, is an internationally recognised vaccine developer having worked as the head of the Vaccine Development Office at the German Centre. Perhaps no more tired a trope exists in the world of faux cures than the "I have found a problem that no other scientist in the world has thought of and only my untested and unproven cure can stop it" gambit. It is, as McGill's Jonathan Jarry wrote and as Yale's Omer told us, a classic example of the appeal-to-nature fallacy that invokes the primacy of natural solutions, mechanisms, or substances over those deemed unnatural and human created. Dr. Vanden Bossche has become world famous for warning Humanity against the health danger of conducting mass vaccination programs during a pandemic. "There is a sound scientific rationale to assume," Vanden Bossche wrote, "that it is possible to prime NK cells" in ways for them to recognize and kill Coronaviruses at large (including all their variants) at an early stage of infection." And its true. Come to think of it, the similarities between Dr. Vanden Bossche and Andrew Wakefield strike me as stronger than ever now, given that, as well documented by Brian Deer, Wakefield basically published his fraudulent science to support the claim that the MMR vaccine causes autism in order to make a market for his own single vaccine against the measles. Dr Geert Vanden Bossche from Belgium - what's the truth? His argument sounds a lot like an argument Andrew Wakefield once made for MMR. One benefit of several current COVID-19 vaccines, most notably the mRNA vaccines, is that they can be easily modified to induce the development of antibodies programmed specifically to deal with whatever new variants crop up. You know what? pandemic is now at risk of resultng in a global catastrophe without equal, this call cannot sound loudly . After all, as Nirenberg and the review article I quoted above note, while it is true that variants of concern demonstrate reduced antibody neutralization, we do not as yet have an absolute correlate regarding how high an antibody level is required to be protective, making the practical meaning of this observation difficult to determine. Biology is so complex. SOURCE: Geert Vanden Bossche, Children's Health Defense, The HighWire. In a sense it is, but he misses the main point, Dr. Offit told me. Failure to comply with these requirements is at risk of granting microbes a chance to survive and hence, may cause the disease to fare [sic] up. He held adjunct faculty appointments at universities in Belgium and Germany. Let me try to explain this by means of a more easily understood phenomenon: Antimicrobial resistance. The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic | Amazon.com.br Dr. Bossches concern about imperfect vaccines allowing the virus to mutate should be dwarfed by the much larger, evidence-based worry of allowing the virus to mutate inside of unvaccinated people. After all, if a human vaccine lets deadlier versions of a disease flourish, that is all the more reason to be protected from those deadly strains. Mass Vaccination in a Pandemic - Benefits versus Risks: Interview with Geert Vanden Bossche Vejon Health 46.7K subscribers 1.5M views 1 year ago Highlighting the principle of using a. Geert Vanden Bossche received his DVM from the University of Ghent, Belgium, and his PhD degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany. At birth, our innate immune system is unexperienced but well-established. If you havent, its new to you. And if you have been at this for a while, like Dr. David Gorski who has followed and denounced the anti-vaccination movement since time immemorial, you may even pick up on similarities with the disgraced Andrew Wakefield. A very similar mechanism may also apply to viruses, especially to viruses that can easily and rapidly mutate (which is, for example, the case with Coronaviruses); when the pressure exerted by the armys (read: populations) immune defense starts to threaten viral replication and transmission, the virus will take on another coat so that it can no longer be easily recognized and, therefore, attacked by the host immune system. (I note that Dr. Vanden Bossche only set up his Twitter account two weeks ago and already has over 16K followers.) This book is extremly well researched. Hes arguing that vaccinating the elderly protects them, but because the virus will therefore be forced to infect the young it will only be able to do so if it can somehow escape immunity to the antibodies to spike protein (S-specific Abs) transiently raised in asymptomatic subjects. This is a bad argument. He invokes the discovery of variants currently in circulation that have altered portions of the spike protein the target of COVID-19 vaccine implying that these observations lead credence to his hypothesis. MASS VACCINATION of the ELDERLY. COVID-19 mass vaccination will select for more virulent variants of the virus that causes COVID-19, which will escape vaccine-induced immunity and cause more severe disease. Geert is now primarily serving as a Biotech/Vaccine consultant while also conducting his own research on Natural Killer cell-based vaccines. A certain friend of the blog has written about this (at least twice), as has Skeptical Raptor. Geert Vanden Bossche articles analyzed - Health Feedback Specifically, scientists have long been pointing out that, the more we let COVID-19 circulate, the more likely virus variants that can escape the immune response to the vaccine (and/or to natural infection) are to emerge, and they use this argument as a rationale for vaccinating as many people as possible as fast as possible, in order to slow that circulation of the virus to as low a rate as possible, thus reducing the opportunities for strains resistant to the vaccine and strains able to re-infect previously infected people to emerge.