2016513Chem Liu, L.; Ruiz, David A.; Munz, D.; Bertrand, G., A Singlet Phosphinidene Stable at Room Temperature. If your manuscript is sent for peer-review, you will also be asked to complete the Nature Portfolio Editorial Policy Checklist. npj Series journals require potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and require referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. When selecting Reviewers, we seek to avoid conflicts of interest and close associates of the authors. Please do not submit revisions as new manuscripts. | When creating and submitting digital files, please follow the guidelines below. Nat. G Protein Coupled . Safety hazards posed by reagents or protocols should be identified clearly. The peer review process of any submission associated with a collection or special issue is handled by an Editor who is responsible for assigning at least two referees to each article and evaluating the reviews. Please refer to our editorial policies for more information. Smith, J. Syntax of referencing in How to reference books (ed. Editors and Reviewers will be responsible for assessing the completeness of the characterization. To post social content, you must have a display name. In cases where the work was felt to be of high quality, papers can sometimes be accepted without further review, but if there were serious criticisms, the Editors will consider them in making the decision. DavidUCSDMaxGuyHansmann, M. M.; Jazzar, R.; Bertrand, G., Singlet (Phosphino)phosphinidenes are Electrophilic. The process involves both the journal editors and independent expert reviewers, who evaluate . When creating and submitting digital files, please follow the guidelines . 0, :3.0 | :25.0IF6.0NCBI, 310 At the initial submission stage authors should incorporate figures into the main article file, ensuring that any inserted figures are of sufficient quality to be clearly legible. J. PDF Best practices for authors of healthcare-related artificial The peer review process is a fundamental part of research publishing. SCI . "I think it's a law on the books and it was placed there for a reason," Graham said when asked about applying the 19th century law to the case. It allows for maximum dissemination and re-use of open access materials: users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit) and remix (adapt) the contribution including for commercial purposes, providing they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor. Book titles should be given in italics and all words in the title should have initial capitals. Authors should use approved nomenclature for gene symbols, and use symbols rather than italicized full names (for example Ttn, not titin). This process may involve further consultation with the Reviewers and editor-mediated communications between the Reviewers. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. The Editor has recommended the submission be transferred to another journal, and your response is needed. ), direct structural analysis by NMR spectroscopic methods may not be possible. DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.04.001generalspecialized, , general science, , general chemistryspecialized, UCSDGuy, general interests, , Guy9, wordGuycover letter, cover letterunder evaluationto advisoradvisorgeneralAAASemail2advisorchemistrygeneral science, , Guy, manuscript receivededitor assignedmanuscript under considerationFigure 1Guy, peer reviewGuyDavid, 1, GuyDavid, DavidBlack FridayGuy, 1waiting for revision, 158Cell PressDr. When can I expect a decision from the Editor? Nevertheless, articles published in these sections, particularly if they present technical information, may be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the Editors. The length of time this stage takes does not affect the decision in any way, it's neither a good nor a bad sign. 1.03 g, 0.100 mmol). Funding information should be placed in the Acknowledgement section. Onc.) | What does a status change from "Required reviews completed" back to "Under review" mean? Use the same typeface (Arial or Helvetica) for all figures. | This is known as a rescinding. New submissions that remain Incomplete more than 90 days will be removed. The journal's Editorial team will check the submission and either send back to the author for action, or assign to an Editor. Other contributed articles are not usually peer-reviewed. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. 1, 72 You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. | Authors should provide a cover letter that includes the affiliation and contact information for the corresponding author. Before submission, the corresponding author ensures that all authors are included in the author list and agree with its order, and that they are aware the manuscript is to be submitted. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. To obtain You have completed the submission and approval steps, and the article has been submitted to the journal. (Abstracts or unrefereed web preprints do not compromise novelty). You should have received an email detailing the changes needed to your submission. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Using this system, authors can upload manuscript files (text, figures, videos) directly to our office and check on the status of their manuscripts during the review process. It is published online with accepted manuscripts. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Copies of any papers containing related work that are under consideration or in-press at other journals should be included with the submission as additional supplementary information. Recoloring primary data, such as fluorescence images, to color-safe combinations such as green and magenta or other accessible color palettes is strongly encouraged. These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. Thank you for visiting nature.com. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Ranges are more appropriate than standard deviations or standard errors for small data sets. There is a waiver policy for these charges. Thank you for your feedback, it will help us serve you better. Small sample size: When the sample size is small (less than about 10), authors should use tests appropriate to small samples or justify their use of large-sample tests. Suitably high resolution figures may be inserted within the text at appropriate positions or grouped at the end. ICP14018916-1 tips. Best practice For information about referencing human single-nucleotide variants, see this editorial from Nature Genetics. The corresponding author is notified by e-mail when the Editor decides to send a paper for review. Smith, S.) 180-181 (Macmillan, 2013). 50decision sent to authorwaiting for revisionFigure 2 DavidUCSDfacetime50"f**king awesome" What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Review | Open Journal Systems on 24 Dec, 2017, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Nature CommunicationsTips: NCOnline: 140250268 . Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Sometimes, this can take anywhere between 2-6 weeks. In practice, the implementation of step-down or step-up strategies includes 1) the use of risk prediction, 2) tools to support shared decision-making and 3) communication between . About the editorial process: As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer then you had anticipated. npj Vaccines is part of the npj Series: open access community journals from Nature Portfolio publishing high-quality research, reviews and commentary across the life, health, physical, applied and environmental sciences. If this a 'Reject and Transfer' type of decision and no previous editor has done so, you will be prompted to select target journals for the transfer offer before the Notify Author page appears. npj Vaccines - DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals The journals operate under a collaborative editorial model, with active researchers engaged as manuscript-handling Editors, supported by in-house, PhD-trained Nature Portfolio managing Editors. To obtain | The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. What does the status of my submission mean in Editorial Manager? The underlying code for this study [and training/validation datasets] is not publicly available for proprietary reasons. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories). [CDATA[// >3Nature CommunicationsTips - [CDATA[> If the decision is not to send the manuscript for review, the Editor contacts the author with the decision. Open access articles are published under a CC BY licence (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence). When all remaining editorial issues are resolved, the paper is formally accepted. Response to Requests for Admission . There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. Each complete figure must be supplied as a separate file upload. Once the status changes from "Under review" to "Ready for decision," it implies that the reviews for your paper have come in and the editor can now make a decision on your paper. The submission process has completed with either an Accept or Reject decision. When plotting data, we require authors to use a format that clearly shows the full data distribution. 41 DOCX Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida - Home Please note that schemes are not used; sequences of chemical reactions or experimental procedures should be submitted as figures, with appropriate captions. Scientific American Blog Network http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/psi-vid/2014/04/09/sloth-squeak (2014). Recoloring primary data, such as fluorescence or rainbow pseudo-coloured images, to colour-safe combinations such as green and magenta, turquoise and red, yellow and blue or other accessible colour palettes is strongly encouraged. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Settings. Responses to requests for admissions are due within 30 days after service, except that a defendant may serve a response within 45 days after service of process and the initial pleading on that defendant. If the funder has played no role in the research, this should be stated. 33 51.67%. You will be asked to complete and submit the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary together with the revised version of your manuscript after peer-review. It's a way of ensuring only articles of the highest quality, which describe sound research methods and results, are published. If the authors ask the Editors to consider the previous reviews, they should include a note explaining the relationship between the submitted manuscript and the previous submission and (assuming it has been revised in light of the referees' criticisms) give a point-by-point response to the referees. However, it might be a good idea to send in a reminder to the editor as this can sometimes help quicken the process. //-->Peer review process | What is peer review | Editor Resources on 22 Dec, 2017, Answered by Radhika Shridhar This status will remain until you begin the process of submitting your revision. Online only: Published conference abstracts, numbered patents and research datasets may be included in the reference list. 4.5. Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. Figure lettering should be in a clear, sans-serif typeface (for example, Helvetica); the same typeface in the same font size should be used for all figures in a paper. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Use symbol font for Greek letters. If the authors have successfully addressed all the comments of the Reviewers and the Editors, the Editors will deem the paper acceptable for publication in npj Vaccines. In legends, please use verbal explanations such as "open red triangles" rather than visual queues. Answer: When the status for a manuscript changes "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision", it means that the peer-review process is complete and only the editorial decision is pending. At this stage, the editor completes an initial screening of the manuscript, and if he/she finds it suitable for the journal, it is sent for peer review. In particular, when you submit a . npj Parkinsons Disease . |021-54481353 In your 'Author Main Menu' manuscripts appear in different folders as they pass through phases in the editorial process: The submission is waiting for you to complete the submission (or revision) process. Reviewers submit their reports to the Editor. Author CD serves as [Editor role title] of this journal and had no role in the peer-review or decision to publish this manuscript. Each figure legend should be presented on the same page as its figure. Books: Graphs should include clearly labeled error bars. Avoid listing multiple names of genes (or proteins) separated by a slash, as in 'Oct4/Pou5f1', as this is ambiguous (it could mean a ratio, a complex, alternative names or different subunits). The submission remains at this status until you select "Build PDF for Approval". Internet Explorer). Article titles should be in Roman text, the first word of the title should be capitalized and the title written exactly as it appears in the work cited, ending with a full stop. Author: NPJ Tornado Warning Issued - March 30, 2022; 11:21AM. Unusual units or abbreviations should be spelled out in full or defined in the legend. (However, don't yet rewrite your manuscript . Stamped Concrete Cyprus Uncategorized waiting to send decision to author npj. waiting to send decision to author npj. Are you sure you do not want to provide feedback? Manuscripts submitted to npj Precision Oncology do not need to adhere to our formatting requirements at the point of initial submission; formatting requirements only apply at the time of acceptance. When submitting a final manuscript for publication, all figures must be uploaded as separate figure files ensuring that the image quality and formatting conforms to the specifications below. Copyright 2014-2023 All Rights Reserved. The Editors-in-Chief then makes a final decision of accept or reject on any special issue article. Authors must ensure that their Methods section includes adequate experimental and characterization data necessary for others in the field to reproduce their work. (()--2020-0033) Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. This status will remain until an Editor takes an action in the system to change the status, usually inviting reviewers. Authors should provide a statement confirming the source, identity and purity of known compounds and biomolecules that are central to the scientific study, even if they are purchased or resynthesised using published methods. If you would like to submit a suggestion for the featured image on our homepage with the final version of your manuscript, please also include the Image Licence to Publish form. PDF What Happens to My Paper - Wiley Online Library How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. and JavaScript. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of [third party name]. Hi, I have submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal. In today's Big Idea, author Christian Klaver invites us to take a look into the magical world he created for his book-loving daughter. At publication, Nature Portfolio journals consider it best practice to release custom computer code in a way that allows readers to repeat the published results. How do I find and access my journal's submission system. Hao, Z., AghaKouchak, A., Nakhjiri, N. & Farahmand, A. J. Multi-part/panel figures must be prepared and arranged as a single image file (including all sub-parts; a, b, c, etc.). Authors will see a proof that will include figures. How long one should wait on an editor's decision depends on a variety of factors - your stature within your profession, the quality of the journal to which you submitted the manuscript, and the. 2023-04-26 4061 513. Nature Chem.- X-MOL It should be clear what statistical test was used to generate every P value. A PDF has been built, either by you or by the editor, that requires your approval to move forward. Your new or revised submission has been sent back by the Editorial Team for changes prior to review. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Under Creative Commons licences, authors retain copyright in their work. If you require assistance, please scroll down and use one of the contact options to get in touch. However, this decision must be made at the time of initial submission and cannot be changed later. If it still remains the same then withdraw it and . Printed journals: . Figures are best prepared at the size you would expect them to appear in print. In addition, Reviewers can access the manuscript online, which speeds up the review process. Chem. 3, :2.0 | :50.0IF=6, 52 Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? npj Breast Cancer--MedSci.cn 110 The data that support the findings of this study are available from [third party name] but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study, and so are not publicly available. 2022.12.13 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision #1hhhh . 31010402000380, , editor@medsci.cn. We request that authors avoid "data not shown" statements and instead make their data available via deposition in a public repository (see 'Reporting standards and availability of data, materials, code and protocols' for more information). I do understand that you cannot have exact answer. | NC . [CDATA[// >